MegaMaester

Scientific Thinking · Lesson 5

Pseudoscience and Scientific Misconduct

beginner18 min · 7 cards
The big idea
🧿

It borrows everything except the vulnerability

What separates pseudoscience is not its subject but what it does when evidence disagrees.

Try it

Spot the Marker

It works, but only for those genuinely open to it.

Which pseudoscientific marker is doing the work?

Identify which pseudoscientific move each claim relies on.
Three different things

Do not conflate them

Tap each.

Key term

The Galileo defence

Does being rejected suggest you are right?
tap to reveal ↻
No
Semmelweis was rejected and correct. Countless others were rejected and wrong — we simply do not remember them. What distinguished him was data, not rejection.
Nuance

Twelve years

Maester Note

The 1998 MMR paper was fully retracted in 2010 after undisclosed conflicts and misrepresented data came to light. Self-correction worked — and not fast enough to prevent harm.

Quick check

When is a truncated y-axis legitimate?