MegaMaester

Critical Thinking · Lesson 8

Evaluating Information

beginner15 min · 9 cards
The first sort

Fact or opinion?

FactCan be checkedTrue or falseOpinionA judgementCan have reasons
Stated as checkable, or stated as felt?
The big idea
🔍

Finding it is easy. Trusting it is the skill.

Judging what deserves your trust is a repeatable procedure, not a personality trait.

Compare

How far from the source?

Primary

The original record

Tap.
tap for example ↻
Secondary

Someone retelling it

Tap.
tap for example ↻

A cautious finding becomes a confident headline becomes a settled fact. Nobody had to lie.

Try it

Source Checker

Who produced it?

The company selling the product, published on its own site.

What incentive?

Strong — the result determines sales. Not disqualifying, but it raises the bar.

Corroborated?

No independent replication cited.

Verdict

Treat as a claim to check, not as evidence. Look for independent trials.

Four questions applied to four kinds of source.
Key term

The technique that works

What do professional fact-checkers do differently?
tap to reveal ↻
Lateral reading
They leave the page and see what other sources say about it — instead of reading harder into a page designed to convince them.
Nuance

The tell

Maester Note

A strong emotional pull is a reason for more scrutiny, not less. That reaction is often the product, not a side effect.

Recap

Key takeaways

  • Primary sources beat secondary reporting; detail drifts at every retelling.
  • Systematic evidence outranks expert judgement, which outranks anecdote.
  • Ask who produced it, what they gain, whether it is corroborated, and whether it is current.
  • Lateral reading beats reading harder into a single page.
  • Strong emotional pull is a reason for more scrutiny, not less.
Quick check

What best describes critical thinking?